In my opinion watercolours were always a second-rate artform.
I’m sure my contempt dated back to primary school art lessons. The clumsy
splotches of watery colour, the pools of paint, the ubiquitous brown which seemed
to annex every other tone, from a young age I associated watercolours with chaos.
And not creative chaos either but sheer anarchy, albeit of a watered-down
variety. As far as I was concerned watercolours barely even classified as art,
unless your idea of a masterpiece was a soggy sheet of crumbling paper.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgF_F1grTE13Gd-W21IU5Fx-ZYOL0_cmCuagXzu1rOIZZqlhpMTyQIm6klGSp6K5u3fxv3Ugb2lZCdef97UDlGptwb17tLSXIud2zofc5UcePv4Xme9c0E98TZgfvVPg_3yTMgkrTG23vDI/s320/SW2.jpg)
Never in my life have I seen watercolours created with such delicate
and effervescent beauty. Sargent’s palette seems to sparkle out of the frame in
a way that oil paintings could only envy. I could feel the Mediterranean sun
toasting his Venetian palazzos, while swaying with the water surging underneath.
The way he draped light over his landscapes addsan extra layer of ephemeral
gorgeousness to the underlying view, like a piece of couture over a naked body.
The evening sun reflecting off Santa Maria della Salute smoulders sensuously,
as if the church itself throws ‘come-hither’ eyes in our direction. These
pictures peer out from a dream landscape, one too perfect, too idealised for
our own universe.
I entered the exhibition with a distaste for watercolours: I
left intoxicated with their beauty. I wandered if I should give them another
shot myself. But I doubt I could rival Sargent’s gift for the sublime. I might
just leave it to the experts.
No comments :
Post a Comment